Hitachi- from the country that brought the world Fukushima

Hitachi- from the country that brought the world Fukushima
We feel very sad for the people of Japan who want to end nuclear energy whilst a potential new government and big business are desperate for it

No Fukushima at Oldbury

No to Fukushima at Shepperdine!

No to Fukushima at Shepperdine!
オールド全く福島ません

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

Will we get a reply about the depressurisation due next week?

We sent this message to Magnox today and are now awaiting their reply.

zoe.young@magnoxnorthsites.com    MAgnox Contact

Dear Zoe
>
> I am a resident of Shepperdine Road in Oldbury Naite  and have been informed by somebody who attended the recent SG meeting that there is a depressurisation/ outage due for one of the reactors on the 10th May.
>
> Can you confirm that this is the case and if so what precautions we should take to avoid any radioactive contamination.
>
> I speedy reply is sought so that we can plan our whereabouts on Tuesday, in Oldbury or going out of town.
>
> Cheers


No reply as of yet..........nothing new from our friends at Magnox and NDA.

Five People of Muslim Background arrested under The Terrorism Act


Sellafield terror arrests prompt London police raids

Four addresses searched of five men alleged to have been filming near nuclear site in Cumbria
The Sellafield nuclear site near where five men were arrested under the Terrorism Act
The Sellafield nuclear site: five men were arrested nearby under the Terrorism Act. Photograph: Owen Humphreys/PA
Counter-terrorism officers are questioning five east London men alleged to have been filming near the Sellafield nuclear site in Cumbria.
The Metropolitan police said four houses in east London had been searched in a series of raids on addresses linked to those detained.
The five were arrested under section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which says a "constable may arrest without a warrant a person whom he reasonably suspects to be a terrorist". The investigation is at an early stage. Some past arrests by UK counter-terrorism officials have led to people being released without charge.
The arrests came hours after the death of Osama bin Laden had been announced and security was increased at key sites across the UK, though police say they are not "at this stage" connecting the arrests to the al-Qaida leader's death at the hands of US special forces.
The men were detained at 4.32pm on Monday after a vehicle was stopped and checked by officers from the Civil Nuclear Constabulary (CNC), which polices the facility in west Cumbria.
The five, all in their 20s and from London, were held in police custody overnight in Carlisle before being taken to Manchester on Tuesday morning, a spokesman for Cumbria police said. The investigation has been taken over by the north-west counter-terrorism unit.
The arrests, sources say, are not intelligence-led. The men may have been taking photographs or video footage, a source suggested. It is understood that a video camera was removed from the men.
The police have not confirmed the ethnicity of the arrested men, though they are believed to be from a Muslim background.
Sellafield confirmed that the five men had been arrested close to the site, saying: "It is a security issue and our security people are having discussions."
The spokesman said the plant had not been evacuated. Roads leading up to Sellafield were sealed off by police during the arrests, but security is likely to remain tight at the site for the next few weeks.
The sprawling coastal site is heavily protected by both private security guards and officers from the CNC, some of whom are armed.
According to reports last year, a counter-terrorism review of Britain'snuclear power plants was carried out after fears arose over safety at Sellafield.
Officials at HM Inspectorate of Constabulary, which is responsible for assessing the work of police forces across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, had begun an urgent assessment, it was claimed.
Concerns about protecting the plant may have come to light during an exercise in which special forces posed as terrorists to test security, said a report last December.
Sellafield is responsible for decommissioning and reprocessing nuclear waste and manufacturing fuel, on behalf of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.
The site has been operating since the 1940s, when it was used as a Royal Ordnance factory supporting the second world war effort. The site is also home to the world's first commercial nuclear power station, Calder Hall, which operated from 1956 to 2003.
Today the site comprises redundant buildings associated with early defence work, and operating facilities associated with the Magnox reprocessing programme, the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (Thorp), the Sellafield Mox plant and a range of waste treatment plants.

Dr Carl Clowes to attend E.on AGM in Essen tomorrow

Dr Carl Clowes of the campaign group at our sister site for new nuclear, Wylfa in Anglesey, is representing Oldbury and Wylfa at the E.on AGM in Essen, Germany tomorrow.

Let us hope E.on's large shareholders give the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board the same message as at the RWE AGM.

Atomkraft: Nein Danke.

It is sad that the British government do not follow the sensible actions taken By Angela Merkel in this matter.

The pressure to end new nuclear in the UK will have to come from the shareholders of E.on and RWE and the German public who are much better informed than us Brits.




Thursday, 28 April 2011

Oil Leak at Oldbury........EA warns NDA


Oldbury power station warned over River Severn oil leak

Oldbury power stationThe oil leaked into the River Severn

Related Stories

A warning has been issued to Oldbury power station after oil used for cooling leaked into the River Severn.
Managers at the plant near Bristol said the leak on 6 and 7 February had "no measurable environmental impact".
But the Environment Agency said the discharge contravened regulations by "causing polluting matter to enter the Severn estuary".
"The leak was detected by our automatic alarm systems and promptly stopped," a statement from operators Magnox said.
The Environment Agency said it expected "high standards of environmental protection from nuclear operators".
"A warning letter is our lowest formal response to a non-compliance. Improvement actions will be followed up as a part of routine regulation," it said.
"Oldbury has proposed a number of measures that should help mitigate the chances of a further discharge."

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

Reg's RWE Speech in German


Guten Morgen! oder Bore Da wie man auf Walisisch sagt.

Mein Name ist Reg Illingworth und ich komme aus einem kleinen Dorf in South Gloucestershire in England. Ich vertrete besorgte Bürger und Bürgerinnen aus den Gemeinden Oldbury und Wylfa, zwei Ortschaften wo RWE und E.ON den Bau von neuen Atomkraftwerken planen. RWE und E.ON wollen hier bis zu sechs Atomreaktoren errichten und haben dazu ein Joint Venture namens „Horizon Nuclear Power“ gegründet.

Die Bürger von Oldbury und Wylfa sind gastfreundliche und gutherzige Menschen. Wir werden nun aber mit einer Entwicklung konfrontiert zu der wir weder befragt noch gehört wurden. Oldbury und Wylfa sind zwei von acht Gemeinden in Großbritannien, die von unserer Regierung als „geeignete“ Standorte für neue Atomkraftwerke auserkoren wurden. Man rechnete bei uns mit wenig Widerstand, da an diesen Standorten bereits Atomkraftwerke im betrieb sind.

In Wylfa und Oldbury stehen gefährliche Magnox Reaktoren, die schon vor Jahren hätten stillgelegt werden müssen. Oldbury ist gar das älteste noch genutzte Atomkraftwerk weltweit, trotzdem hat die Britische Atomaufsicht erst kürzlich wieder seine Laufzeit verlängert. Dabei ereignen sich hier immer wieder besorgniserregende Zwischenfälle – so wurden erst kürzlich bei einer unplanmäßigen Abschaltung das Äquivalent von rund 365.000 Kesselladungen Dampf an die Umwelt abgegeben.

Da ich selbst aus Oldbury bin, möchte ich die Situation hier etwas genauer schildern. Es gibt vor Ort keine Unterstützung für die Neubaupläne von RWE and E.ON. Die örtlichen Kirchen, der Gemeinderat, der Gemeindedirektor und unser lokaler Parlamentsabgeordneter haben sich alle gegen einen Bau neuer Reaktoren ausgesprochen. Wir wollen Ihre Atomreaktoren nicht!

Ich möchte Ihnen einige der Gründe nennen:

  1. Der geplante AKW Standort in Oldbury ist als Flutgebiet der Zone 3, d.h. mit der höchsten Flutgefahr, klassifiziert. Bisher waren hier deshalb selbst kleine Wohnbebauungen untersagt. Dieser Abschnitt der englischen Küste wurde 1607 von einer Riesenwelle, einem Tsunami heimgesucht und über 2.000 Menschen ertranken. Es dürfte schwierig und teuer sein, Ihr Vorhaben gegen eine solche Naturkatastrophe zu schützen.

  1. Die Pläne sehen vor, dass RWE und E.ON am Standort Oldbury auch hochradioaktiven Abfall lagern. Möglicherweise bis zu 160 Jahren – solange kann es dauern bis in Großbritannien ein Endlager eingerichtet wird. Dieser Müll hat jedoch in einem Flutgebiet nichts zu suchen.

  1. In Großbritannien haben wir bereits leidvolle Erfahrungen mit terroristischen Anschlägen machen müssen. In Oldbury patroullieren nicht ohne Grund schwer bewaffnete Polizisten das Gebiet rund um das bestehende AKW. Denn Atomkraftwerke sind höchst verwundbare Ziele. Fukushima zeigt uns zudem, dass nicht nur das Reaktorgebäude, sondern auch die Kühlsysteme, Notstromversorgung und Becken für abgebrannte Brennstäbe gegen Gefahren abgesichert sein müssen. Ich denke, es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis Osama Bin Laden irgendwann beim Nachmittagstee in den Bergen Pakistans auf die Idee kommt, dass man durch einen Angriff auf ein Atomkraftwerk noch mehr Angst, Schrecken und Zerstörung anrichten kann als durch den Angriff auf das World Trade Center. Herr Grossmann, ich frage Sie: Können Sie einen schweren Unfall in Folge eines terroristischen Angriffs auf die bei uns geplanten Atomanlagen ausschließen?

  1. Wir sind aber auch besorgt wegen der Gesundheitsrisiken im Normalbetrieb. Seit der vom bundesdeutschen Amt für Strahlenschutz herausgegebene Studie zu Kinderkrebs in der Umgebung von Kernkraftwerken weiß man, dass die Leukämierate für Kinder in der Nähe von Atomkraftwerken um 118% erhöht ist. Davor wollen wir unsere Kinder bewahren.

  1. Seit Fukushima muss das Restrisiko der Atomkraft neubewertet werden. Das gilt auch für die in Oldbury und Wylfa geplanten Reaktoren. Oldbury ist nur 20 Kilometer von Bristol, einer der größten Städte Englands, entfernt. Wenn es – Gott bewahre – hier einen schweren Unfall gäbe, müssten über eine Millionen Menschen evakuiert werden und unser Leben und unsere Wirtschaft würden einen beträchtlichen Schaden erleiden. Ist RWE in der Lage für solche Schäden aufzukommen? Ich denke nicht.

  1. Der Standort in Oldbury befindet sich an einer Flussmündung mit schwachem Unterboden. Der Zugang zum Gelände ist schwierig, da die Straßeninfrastruktur auf der Landseite spärlich und Zugang auf der Flussseite durch die Tiden stark beschränkt ist . Unseres Wissens reicht auch die Größe des von Ihnen bisher erworbenen Gelände nicht aus. Ich frage Sie deshalb: Planen RWE und E.ON weitere Landkäufe in Oldbury?

Ich möchte noch ein paar grundsätzliche Dinge zu dem Markt sagen in dem RWE investieren will. Das britische Atomprogramm hat die schlechteste ökonomische Bilanz von allen Atomprogrammen in Industrieländern. Herausragende Beispiele sind die Atomkraftwerke Dungeness B mit einer Bauzeit von 24 Jahren und Sizewell B, dessen Bau 1995 über 3,8 Milliarden kostete und das im Rahmen der Privatisierung verschenkt werden musste, da es keiner erwerben wollte. 1992 mussten britische Steuerzahler gar 12 Milliarden Euro aufbringen, um den Atombetreiber British Energy vor dem Bankrott zu bewahren. Soll das ein lukrativer Markt für RWE sein?

Schauen wir uns doch RWEs eigene Kennziffern für „Return on Capital employed“ an: Die RWE AG als ganzes hat hier 2009 eine Rendite von 16,3 % erzielt. Für RWE Npower in Großbritannien lag dieser Betrag bei nur 4,9%. In Ihrem Bericht für 2009 wurde der Wertbeitrag für „Shareholder Value Added“ in Großbritannien gar mit minus 254 Millionen Euro angegeben.

Wenn RWE und E.ON an ihren Plänen für Oldbury und Wylfa festhalten, riskieren sie viele Milliarden von Euro. Im Gegensatz zu Ihrem Konkurrenten Electricite de France, der 15 Milliarden Euro für den Kauf von British Energy aufgewendet hat, um den Weg für seine Atompläne in Großbritannien zu ebenen, wäre es für RWE und E.ON ein leichtes sich von ihren Atomplänen zu verabschieden.

Investieren Sie nicht in ein Atomgrab sondern stattdessen in kosteneffektive und umweltfreundliche Erneuerbare Projekte. Tun sie es für die Zukunft Ihres Konzerns. Tun Sie es für die Bürger und Bürgerinnen von Westengland und Wales.

Vielen 

Saturday, 23 April 2011

Reg's Report from the RWE AGM

Hi Guys

This article is from Reuters and shows a photo from inside the Grugahalle in
Essen at the RWE AGM. I was on the second row at the front , very close to the
lectern, one seat out of this photo.

I arrived at the halle at 8am with Simone from urgewald, a german environmental
group, who were my hosts for the day.

By the time we arrived there were approx. 200 protestors outside chanting for
'abschalten.....close them down'

Heffa Schucking the MD of urgewald had arranged for various press and TV
interviews which I took part in during the day, I did three TV interviews with
WDR 1, apparently the largest publicly owned TV company in Germany.

At 8.30 we progressed into the halle and I picked up my 50 RWE shares and voting
documents.

We then went to register our speeches, Heffa asking for Grossmann to resign and
mine explaining about the plight of Oldbury and Wylfa.....see
www.shepperdineagainstnuclearenergy.blogspot.com for full transcript.

By 10am there was at least 500 protestors outside the halle who were sitting on
route to the entrance. The board announced there would be a delay as still lots
of the 5000 people were outside.

The Grugahalle hold up to 8,700 people, there must have been at least 200 TV
screens, so you could watch and hear the proceedings whilst eating a bratwurst
and pretzel, the dinner rooms were burgeoning with people and media, it took me
half an hour to get a bratwurst!!

After about a 15 minute delay proceedings started with a speech from Grossmann
the CEO of RWE. As soon as he started to speak small pockets of shareholding
protestors against atomkraft became evident.

Throughout the duration of his speech seven small groups of shareholders
requesting 'abschalten' were removed from the halle by pretty bulky security
guards.

It was evident the utter abhorrence that german public now feel for atomkraft.

This type of protest had never occurred before at the RWE AGM.

Following Grossmann's dismal speech and the general feeling from the boards
(Supervisory and Executive) that RWE are doomed...you can,t build an energy
company today on nuclear, lignite and coal and a massive contribution from
renewables of 1.5 per cent.

Then came the turn of the shareholders to speak.

Up first was a representative of Allianz , a big, shareholder, who roundly
condemned the nuclear element of the business, the fourth largest shareholder
wanted the business to change away from nuclear and coal if it is to have a
future, they also questioned the relationship with E.on and the nuclear
involvement in the UK which has to be sorted out by 2015.

Of all the speakers most mentioned Fukushima and nuclear. Very few could take
any positives of RWEs continuing support of atomkraft.

Schucking then made her lucid speech requesting the immediate resignation of
Grossmann which was met with support from around the halle.

Then came my turn with my colleague from urgewald , Simone, after being allowed
to speak two sentences in English, Simone took over and I was left to make eye
contact with as many shareholders around the vast halle.

Following the speech Herr Grossmann addressed three questions I had asked.

They may need more land for the Oldbury development, It is the British
government that wants new nukes and RWE are just trying to help them, The
British government is looking at the terrorism issue and if they are satisfied
then RWE would be happy, They are waiting for the results of the stress tests
and the Weightman report.

Herr Grossmann did offer to meet me privately after the event to discuss my
issues in further detail but unfortunately I had to leave to catch my plane.

It is an offer that I would like to take up in the future.

The next visit to Essen and the Grugahalle will be in early May when E.on have
their AGM, Dr Carl Clowes from the Wylfa campaign will be attending as a member
of the critical shareholders association.

Thanks............we will win this one.......no doubt!

Reg


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "Reuters_News@reuters.com" <Reuters_News@reuters.com>
To: "oldburynuclear@btinternet.com" <oldburynuclear@btinternet.com>
Sent: Saturday, 23 April, 2011 10:29:48
Subject: Reuters.com - Human cost of nuclear power too high - German minister


reg illingworth (regillingworth@me.com) has sent you this article.  Personal
Message:    People of the UK cast off your shackles  Reuters.com - Human cost
of nuclear power too high - German minister   
http://uk.reuters.com/article/email/idUKTRE73L1LU20110422  This service is not
intended to encourage spam. The details provided by your colleague have been
used for the sole purpose of facilitating this email communication and have not
been retained by Thomson Reuters. Your personal details have not been added to
any database or mailing list.  If you would like to receive news articles
delivered to your email address, please subscribe at
http://www.reuters.com/newsmails 

Friday, 22 April 2011

RWE, Nukes and lignite, Allianz question the path to the future


Hi Everybody,


I attended the RWE AGM meeting in Essen in Germany on Wednesday 20th at the invite of the "critical shareholders association" .

Of the speakers the largest and fourth largest shareholders in RWE-----Representing billions of pounds of investment--- requested that they end their involvement in nuclear energy.

They even went as far as questioning the involvement with E.on in the UK new nuclear market.

My take from the meeting is that nuclear is stone dead forever in Germany and that no German company will ever want to build nuclear anywhere in the world....including UK.

Whether Oldbury and Wylfa are packaged and sold on to another potential investor is doubtful.

Where would the finance and insurance come from?.............certainly not Allianz

We will be at the E.on AGM at Essen in May !

The politicians who read this blog should realise that we now have the support and strategy of significant supporters in Germany who are happy to help.

Good news and thanks

Atomkraft:Nein Danke

Reg
 
Site Meter