Latest letter from Tim that states there is a requirement for additional land at the Shepperdine Site.
Dear Reg,
Many thanks for your email.
In response to your query on the amount of land required to build the proposed new nuclear power station near Oldbury, I can confirm that the permanent operational plant and buildings we need would be within the 150 hectare site we currently have and which was largely included within the original Strategic Siting Assessment (SSA) nomination. This would include the land needed for either possible reactor design and associated cooling towers.
Consistent with the SSA nomination process, we have always said that we may need more land for use during construction, or for landscaping, ecological or other mitigation measures and in fact, this is reiterated in the public scoping report we published in 2009.
It’s not really valid to make a direct comparison between the Wylfa and Oldbury landholdings. Wylfa has a very different geography, geology and topography, and it is not possible to assume an identical situation for both sites in terms of the required development areas. As our studies continue at Oldbury, and we evaluate flood protection, transport options, and construction needs, further land requirements will become clearer.
With regards to your question about access roads, our view, again as outlined in the scoping report, remains unchanged. We believe that the access route to the existing power station will be sufficient for the purposes of construction with some possible minor upgrading (which will need to be clarified when more information on the proposals is known). We propose a new access road connecting to our site from a point just before the entrance into the existing power station.
Our full transport assessment for the project is still on–going and when completed we are committed to sharing the findings with local people ahead of any formal consultation on our proposals.
I hope that this answers your queries. Please do get in touch if you need further information.
Kind regards,
Tim
Tim ProudlerOldbury Planning and Consents ManagerHorizon Nuclear Power
Posts
They are going to need a hell of a lot more land to accomodate the necessary landscaping mitigation measures to mitigate the huge visual impact of these cooling towers. Even the so called "smaller" hybrid high towers will need huge banks all around the site planted with trees to screen them. This alone will easily double the site area. This is not a question of they "may" need more land its a absolute dead cert. If you think about hostels for temporary workers accomodation, site storage and parking as well this could end up taking up the entire village of Shepperdine and beyond. Us locals had better standby for the bully boy rackman style evictions. Once the NPS is designated houses will tumble in value and Horizon can rub their hands with glee at the cheap prices they will have to pay for the Shepperdine land and homes. This totally sucks. Horizon are misleading us all including DECC how dare they say they may need more land in way that sounds like they only need a hectare or 2... this will be at least 100 hectares of our green and pleasant land. This is another typical misinformation exercise by these greedy foreign electricity giants... grrrrrrrrrrrrrr
ReplyDelete