Our Comment
With our MP, Steve Webb, unable to represent his electorate in any debate about new nuclear we feel that our constitutional rights will be comprimised in one of the most significant decisions that will ever be made in Thornbury and Yate.
Let Steve represent us in this matter!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major infrastructure stays on fast-track as planning quango closes.
A new democratic, fast track system for decision making on major infrastructure projects to support the UK's return to economic growth was confirmed today by Decentralisation Minister Greg Clark.
Mr Clark confirmed that the Infrastructure Planning Commission - a quango with the power to approve major infrastructure projects - will be abolished in line with the Coalition Agreement.
New democratic system
It will be replaced with a new rapid and accountable system where Ministers, not unelected commissioners, will take the decisions on new infrastructure projects critical to the country's future economic growth.
A Major Infrastructure Planning Unit will be established in the Planning Inspectorate to continue fast-tracking major infrastructure projects like offshore windfarms and nuclear power stations. Ministers will take decisions on applications within the same statutory fast-track timeframe as the current regime.
In addition, all National Policy Statements (NPS), the Government's future infrastructure blueprints, will now be subject to ratification by Parliament. Ministers believe these critically important national documents must have the strongest possible democratic legitimacy.
Decentralisation Minister Greg Clark said:
"New infrastructure is critical to the country's return to economic growth and we believe we must have a fast track system for major projects - but it must be accountable.
"The previous system lacked any democratic legitimacy by giving decision making power away to a distant quango on issues crucial to every community in the country.
"Today the coalition is remedying those deficiencies by putting in place a new fast track process where the people's elected representatives have responsibility for the final decisions about Britain's future instead of unelected commissioners."
Energy Minister Charles Hendry added:
"A fast and efficient planning system is critical for facilitating investment in much needed new energy infrastructure. By abolishing the Infrastructure Planning Commission we will ensure that vital energy planning decisions are democratically accountable."
Matt Thomson, Head of Policy at the Royal Town Planning Institute, said:
"We welcome the Government's clarification that the function of the IPC is to be retained even if the body itself is not. It is critical that there is a specialist body with the skills and expertise to consider proposals for essential major infrastructure projects to allow decisions to be made in the national interest.
"We believe that people's confidence in the system will be strengthened by the commitment that final decisions on major infrastructure projects will be taken by the Secretary of State within a defined timeframe."
David Green, Chief Executive of the UK Business Council for Sustainable Energy said:
"The UK Business Council for Sustainable Energy welcomes the Government's commitment to continuing the streamlining of the consenting process for nationally significant infrastructure projects, which needs to reflect the pressing national need for energy infrastructure and deliver certainty whilst ensuring meaningful dialogue on proposals with communities."
New primary legislation will be brought forward to close the IPC. Until it is in place the IPC will continue to consider and determine applications as National Policy Statements are designated to ensure there is no delay in handling applications.
Monday, 5 July 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
RE: the following statement in the article above:
ReplyDelete"all National Policy Statements (NPS), the Government's future infrastructure blueprints, will now be subject to ratification by Parliament. Ministers believe these critically important national documents must have the strongest possible democratic legitimacy"
I totally agree with SANE - The coalition agreement prevents their MP, in whose constituency they propose to site a new nuclear power station, from representing local concerns in the debate on the NPS. I would love to know how exactly the DECC or C&LG ministers believe that this will give their proposed ratification of the NPS any democratic legitimacy whatsoever! Gagging MPs so they cant object or express local concerns is simply undemocratic plain and simple!!!